12 Apr
2010
12 Apr
'10
4:31 p.m.
On 12 April 2010 20:43, aditya siram
[SNIP] ... why not just call MonadState etc. Monad subclasses? "get" and "put" would then be Monad subclass functions.
Hi At a pinch, that would tie them into their (Haskell) implementation technique. Picking an example I'm somewhat familiar with, Andrzej Filinski defined equivalents in SML using structures - where I think he simply called them 'operations'. Best wishes Stephen