Re: [Haskell-cafe] Good name for this operator?

On Sat, 2008-11-15 at 16:23 -0700, Luke Palmer wrote:

On Sat, Nov 15, 2008 at 3:59 PM, Ariel J. Birnbaum wrote:

...

When working with Applicative, I often find myself defining and using this operator:

(<%>) :: (Applicative f) => f (a -> b) -> a -> f b f <%> x = f <*> pure x

Yeah, me too.

So how does one go about asking for its inclusion in Control.Applicative? We might as well agree on a common name for it... -- Ariel J. Birnbaum