
COBOL is verbose but at least it is easy to understand. but the current
practices in enterprise java programming make legacy Java code verbose,
complicated, low level and impossible to understand without profuse
documentation, diagrams, web references etc. That documentation will
disappear sooner or latter...
2015-09-01 10:40 GMT+02:00 Miguel Mitrofanov
That's not very different from "being forced to use COBOL by your employer". Surely, I'll use one in this case (or quit), but it doesn't make it superior.
01.09.2015, 11:30, "Mike Meyer"
: On Tue, Sep 1, 2015 at 4:12 AM M Farkas-Dyck
wrote: On 31/08/2015, Mike Meyer
wrote: Of course not. There are application areas for which COBOL is clearly superior to - and hence more worthy than - Java. Or Haskell. Name one.
Maintaining ~50-year old government systems that are written in COBOL. ,
_______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
Haskell-Cafe mailing list Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
-- Alberto.