dons:
jason.dusek:
Too bad they didn't pimp Haskell as practical.
It looked like an archaic view of Haskell based on reading wikipedia, imo. Perhaps we should take charge of the wikipedia page, if it is that influential.
To those reading, the wikipedia article is here, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Haskell_(programming_language) Feel free to improve it. We have lots of good content about the current state of the language, compilers, libraries, applications, domains of use, size of community, commercial use and so on on haskell.org, so just apply what you know. Perhaps we can get a better article out of this that more accurately reflects the thousands of people reading this list and using Haskell, the thounsand or so libraries, our excellent optimizing compiler, and the broad range of apps being produced. -- Don