
2010/10/11 Roman Cheplyaka
On Mon, 11 Oct 2010 11:54:12 +0100, Magnus Therning
wrote: On Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 08:37, Michael Snoyman
wrote: [...] Also, now 10 random profiles will be displayed on the homepage. Only "verified users" will be displayed here. I'm also considering adding a new status as well: real picture, so that only people with real images (not cartoons, not identicons) can show up on the homepage. I think this might give a more professional feel. Thoughts?
I'd be weary of making that a requirement, there are good reasons for not putting your picture on the web, just like there are good reasons to not use your real name :-)
... just like there are good reasons not to publish yourself in a public catalogue (such as haskellers.com) at all.
I have nothing against anonymity. I voted against requirement of real names on hackage.
But in this particular case, the whole point to be in the listing is to present yourself. So I find the above proposal very reasonable.
Hi, In the belgian law, an employer can (of course) request a faithful resume, but cannot request the resume to contain a picture of you. This is a clear example where you wish to advertise yourself, but not necessarily with a picture. Anyway, I don't think it is difficult to imagine situations where one doesn't wish to show a picture of his/her face. Cheers, Thu