Re: [Haskell-cafe] Breaking change to Eq accepted by Core Libraries Committee

For what it's worth, one of the examples listed in the issue where (/=) is not simply the negation of (==) is violating the laws. It is the one in https://hackage.haskell.org/package/numbers-3000.2.0.2/docs/Data-Number-Inte... That module defines two intervals to be equal if their bounds are equal, but to be unequal only if they are disjoint. In my eyes this speaks for the proposal, because the library author would have been unable to write the broken instance. (And I did look at the proposal some time ago, whence I feel it was indeed discussed or at least mentioned on this list before.) Olaf