On 6 May 2010 04:18, Pierre-Etienne Meunier
By the way, if someone on this list has got too much time, he could write something that would fulfill the goals of literate programming -- à la web and cweb. Knuth was able to make books with his source code. I believe that lhs2tex is great for classes about haskell or fp, but I never found it satisfying for programs with several modules, for instance.
I think the main difference between cweb and literate haskell is that the former allows documentation _anywhere_, whereas with literate haskell you can't suddenly cut out of a code block to have a discussion on what the next line means (instead you need to have an explicit comment). Unless GHC[i] starts stripping out all non-code from literate haskell files and joining all the code blocks together, I'm not sure if this situation can be remedied.
El 05/05/2010, a las 12:42, Ozgur Akgun escribió:
OK, I've found them!
They were under "/Users/username/.cabal/share/lhs2tex-1.15" and this path was not in the search path of lhs2TeX. I'm using Snow Leoprad. This might be a bug I guess?
Not quite; the lhs2tex documentation says you need to put those .fmt, .sty, etc. files in a texmf directory. -- Ivan Lazar Miljenovic Ivan.Miljenovic@gmail.com IvanMiljenovic.wordpress.com