On Sat, Nov 29, 2008 at 09:00:48PM -0500, Brandon S. Allbery KF8NH wrote:
On 2008 Nov 29, at 20:02, John Meacham wrote:
Oh golly. I never put DrIFT on cabal, apparently whomever tried to cabalize it didn't include the ghc driver script, and also appeared to just drop the documentation from the package altogether. It is things like that that make it very hard to get behind cabal, why was DrIFT crippled just so it can be put on cabal? If cabal wasn't powerful enough to compile DrIFT, and we already had a perfectly good way of compiling it, why the need to shoehorn it in and cause this problem? sigh.
Blaming Cabal for Audrey doing a quick-and-dirty translation (because she didn't have a whole lot of time to spend online and wasn't really familiar with Cabal or Hackage) is just digging for excuses.
Hmm? This wasn't done by Audrey, all the hackage/cabal stuff she has done for my projects has been with my blessing. (and thanks) And creating a crippled version of something you wrote and passing it off as the original, in a way that clearly breaks things for other people definitely is something to get upset about. And no, that is not a technical problem with cabal itself, but it does make me worry about the motivations of some in the project when that sort of breakage seemed like a good idea to someone. John -- John Meacham - ⑆repetae.net⑆john⑈