
25 Jun
2010
25 Jun
'10
6:52 a.m.
Stephen Tetley
On 25 June 2010 05:58, Ivan Miljenovic
wrote: The reason this came up: Thomas Berekneyi wanted to use such classes for the rewrite of FGL, and when he discussed it on #haskell people generally indicated that edison was the best out there but was a bit long in the tooth and something like it should be re-written (though no-one seemed to volunteer... hmmm... :p).
Hi Ivan
Note that if "new-FGL" depends on new packages it might not be acceptable for the Platform; see the thread that this message kicks off:
http://www.haskell.org/pipermail/libraries/2009-August/012378.html
That's been brought up already, and yes I know. -- Ivan Lazar Miljenovic Ivan.Miljenovic@gmail.com IvanMiljenovic.wordpress.com