
Am Dienstag 23 Februar 2010 13:59:49 schrieb Ertugrul Soeylemez:
Jonas Almström Duregård
wrote: Ertugrul: while your solution is minimalistic, Rafael deemed his ~n*log n implementation too inefficient. Thus your ~n^3 implementation is hardly an improvement...
Not quite as bad, nub is O(n^2).
My variant has an advantage, though. It is completely lazy, so it will take a shortcut, as soon as a duplicate is found. Depending on his application, this may be useful or not.
I think the nub-based solution is the best one in general, but it's the base library implementation of nub, which is unfortunate. In fact, with a better nub implementation, this becomes an O(n * log n) time
How can you nub in O(n*log n)? Remember, you only have Eq for nub.
algorithm, too, but with the additional laziness advantage. The article you linked to contains such an implementation, I think.
Greets Ertugrul