19 Aug
2006
19 Aug
'06
6:10 a.m.
On Fri, Aug 18, 2006 at 04:46:14PM +0400, Bulat Ziganshin wrote:
Hello Tim,
Friday, August 18, 2006, 4:26:46 PM, you wrote:
break p = span (not . p)
it's definitely better
and = foldr (&&) True
i think that definitions with omitted arguments can be more hrd to understand to newbie haskellers, especiallyones who not yet know the language. as Tamas suggests, this page can be used to present to such newbies taste of Haskell so listing all the parameters may allow to omit unnecessary complications in this "first look into language"
I think I learned to understand and appreciate omitted arguments from Hal Daume's Yet Another Haskell Tutorial. The exercises there are just great. Tamas