You're right, I think. I wasn't being very scientific with my investigation. Though as mentioned, -fno-full-laziness seems like a bit of a sledgehammer. On 18 Dec 2015 18:54, "Tom Ellis" < tom-lists-haskell-cafe-2013@jaguarpaw.co.uk> wrote:
On Fri, Dec 18, 2015 at 06:43:10PM +0000, David Turner wrote:
Some combination of dummy arguments, NOINLINE and -fno-full-laziness did indeed prevent it from sharing but this definitely seemed unsatisfactory. Particularly that -fno-full-laziness applies to the whole module which feels a bit heavyweight.
I would be very surprised if -fno-full-laziness did not fix the issue on its own. Do you have a simple example which I can reproduce myself that shows that it doesn't?
Tom _______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe