-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 12/15/10 02:36 , Roman Cheplyaka wrote:
Regarding the rationale, I'm not so sure and I'd like to hear an explanation from someone competent. But I assume it has something to do with the fact that if you supply a 'do' argument, you cannot supply any more arguments (because 'do' extends to the right as far as possible). Not that I'm convinced that it is a valid reason to prohibit such construct.
Hm? do {...} would work, as would using indentation per usual layout rules (the next argument would be indented no farther than the "do"). It'd certainly be more confusing to read, though. - -- brandon s. allbery [linux,solaris,freebsd,perl] allbery@kf8nh.com system administrator [openafs,heimdal,too many hats] allbery@ece.cmu.edu electrical and computer engineering, carnegie mellon university KF8NH -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.10 (Darwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAk0SsvUACgkQIn7hlCsL25XM6wCcDvu9G3fc9M5Vv6d2EKZ64X8t k7YAn0hvoyq0KpmAAEyAD4HIWX8HsMTY =11UF -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----