--- On Thu, 6/10/10, Louis Wasserman
Date: Thursday, June 10, 2010, 1:32 AM
Yeah, Control.Parallel would be nice to have. Heck, ideally I could get > the whole Haskell Platform, which would be a reasonable comparison to the huge Java and C++ libraries accessible to those languages.
Out of curiosity, though, Haskell's thread-ring implementation just tumbled down the rankings http://shootout.alioth.debian.org /u64q/program.php?test=threadring&lang=ghc&id=3. Previously, it'd been > doing most of its work on a single core, now it's spread out. Any ideas > for fixin' it? (I'm going to to try using forkOnIO.)
There are 4 sets of "rankings" so - http://shootout.alioth.debian.org/u64/program.php?test=threadring&lang=ghc&id=3 I have been wondering what approach is recommended when one part of a program would be a lot faster with -threaded but other parts of the program would be a lot faster without -threaded. I can see that the C++ and Fortran and ... programmers would just wrap part of their program source code with a pragma.