Re: [Haskell-cafe] Adding a builder to the "bytestring" package?

On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 14:06, Johan Tibell wrote:

On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 10:30 PM, Michael Snoyman wrote:

...

What's the advantage to moving in into binary as opposed to bytestring?

To test that the implementation can indeed be ported to that interface. We could of course skip that step if we want to.

blaze-builder already implements the "binary" builder interface, minus the putWord* functions. I think those would be trivial to reimplement on top of Write. Since it sounds like everyone agrees with / has already thought of moving Builder into bytestring, I'll start poking at a patch. Who is the current patch-reviewer for binary and bytestring?