
For short, type synonyms work for mere aliases, but not for full-fledged> type-level non-inductive functions.> And sometimes we intuitively want to use them as such. Thank you, Yves! It is now more clear for me.
Still, it seems that ability to use partially applied type synonyms would be
very natural (and useful) extension to the language. It would allow to avoid
boilerplate code associated with creating "really new" types instead of just
using synonims for existing ones.
On Wed, Dec 7, 2011 at 3:51 PM, Yves Parès
Ah, maybe Dan could tell us if it works only with GHC 7.
Dmitry, I had your problem many times. The last time was when I saw you could define the ContT monad in terms of Cont (the opposite is done in the mtl). It leads to a simpler code, but you are stucked when trying to define ContT as an instance of MonadTrans:
data Cont r a = ... -- [instances of Monad Cont, blah blah blah]
type ContT r m a = Cont r (m a)
instance MonadTrans (ContT r) where -- This doesn't compile, even if it is logical lift = ...
For short, type synonyms work for mere aliases, but not for full-fledged type-level non-inductive functions. And sometimes we intuitively want to use them as such.
2011/12/7 Dmitry Kulagin
Dmitry, does your code work with LiberalTypeSynonyms extention activated? No, the same error: Type synonym `StateA' should have 1 argument, but has been given 0
But I have GHC 6.12.3
Dmitry 2011/12/7 Yves Parès
: This is impossible: in the definition of 'StateT s m a', m must be a monad and then have the * -> * kind. So you cannot pass (StateA a), because it has simply the * kind.
Dmitry, does your code work with LiberalTypeSynonyms extention activated?
2011/12/7 Øystein Kolsrud
You should be able to write something like this:
type StateB a b = StateT SomeOtherState (StateA a) b
Best regards, Øystein Kolsrud
On Wed, Dec 7, 2011 at 11:48 AM, Dmitry Kulagin
wrote: Hi Dan,
I am still pretty new in Haskell, but this problem annoys me already.
If I define certain monad as a type synonym:
type StateA a = StateT SomeState SomeMonad a
Then I can't declare new monad based on the synonym:
type StateB a = StateT SomeOtherState StateA a
The only way I know to overcome is to declare StateA without `a':
type StateA = StateT SomeState SomeMonad
But it is not always possible with existing code base.
I am sorry, if this is offtopic, but it seemed to me that the problem is realted to partially applied type synomyms you described.
Thanks! Dmitry
On Tue, Dec 6, 2011 at 10:59 PM, Dan Doel
wrote: Greetings,
In the process of working on a Haskell-alike language recently, Ed Kmett and I realized that we had (without really thinking about it) implemented type synonyms that are a bit more liberal than GHC's. With LiberalTypeSynonyms enabled, GHC allows:
type Foo a b = b -> a type Bar f = f String Int
baz :: Bar Foo baz = show
because Bar expands to saturate Foo. However, we had also implemented the following, which fails in GHC:
type Foo a b = b -> a type Bar f = f (Foo Int) (Foo Int) type Baz f g = f Int -> g Int
quux :: Bar Baz quux = id
That is: type synonyms are allowed to be partially applied within other type synonyms, as long as similar transitive saturation guarantees are met during their use.
I don't know how useful it is, but I was curious if anyone can see anything wrong with allowing this (it seems okay to me after a little thought), and thought I'd float the idea out to the GHC developers, in case they're interested in picking it up.
-- Dan
_______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
_______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
-- Mvh Øystein Kolsrud
_______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe