
If GHC handles the explicit "forall" in constructor "T1" in the same way as
it does for function "f", we have:
data T a where T1 :: (forall b. b -> b) -> Int -> T a
Which is totally fine! The main question is then why the "forall"s are
handled differently?
On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 9:07 PM, MigMit
It really seems to me that the error message you've got explains everything quite clear.
Отправлено с iPad
31.07.2012, в 22:59, Shayan Najd Javadipour
написал(а): Hi,
I wonder why the following code doesn't typecheck in GHC 7.4.1:
{-# LANGUAGE GADTs,RankNTypes #-}data T a where T1 :: (forall b. b -> b) -> (forall a. Int -> T a) {- Error: Data constructor `T1' returns type `forall a. Int -> T a' instead of an instance of its parent type `T a' In the definition of data constructor `T1' In the data type declaration for `T' Failed, modules loaded: none. -} While:
{-# LANGUAGE GADTs,RankNTypes #-} f :: (forall b. b -> b) -> (forall a. Int -> Maybe a)f = undefined {- ghci> :t f f :: (forall b. b -> b) -> Int -> Maybe a -}
Thanks, Shayan
_______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe