28 Feb
2016
28 Feb
'16
6:37 p.m.
On Sun, Feb 28, 2016 at 06:33:53PM -0500, Matt wrote:
This has come up before as 'ArgumentDo':
mailing list thread: Proposal: ArgumentDo https://mail.haskell.org/pipermail/ghc-devs/2015-September/009821.html Relevant Phabricator ticket https://phabricator.haskell.org/D1219 Reddit discussion https://www.reddit.com/r/haskell/comments/447bnw/does_argument_do_have_a_fut... Some people like it, though enough don't that the extension was abandoned.
I don't particularly like it, and I don't think I would use it, but what's the argument against it being admitted as an extension? There are far more hairy extensions in GHC already. Tom