
10 Aug
2010
10 Aug
'10
2:40 a.m.
Excerpts from Ertugrul Soeylemez's message of Tue Aug 10 02:31:14 -0400 2010:
There is no evalCont, there is runCont:
runCont :: (a -> r) -> Cont r a -> r
Note that Cont/ContT computations result in a value of type 'r':
newtype Cont r a = Cont ((a -> r) -> r)
Yes, but if you pass in 'id' as the continuation to 'runCont', the entire expression will result in 'a'. The continuation monad doesn't act globally... Still confused, Edward