4 Aug
2017
4 Aug
'17
2:14 p.m.
Not for this case; it's more for setups that want to skip that slot
entirely (possibly stack, possibly third party setups --- I suspect some of
the big in-house folks would use it for custom sandboxing).
On Friday, August 4, 2017, Daniel Trstenjak
Strictly speaking, the second option (specifying the sandbox as the user db) is a more correct match with what cabal-install does
Ok, is there then a need for the `-no-user-package-db`?
-- brandon s allbery kf8nh sine nomine associates allbery.b@gmail.com ballbery@sinenomine.net unix, openafs, kerberos, infrastructure, xmonad http://sinenomine.net