30 Jun
2009
30 Jun
'09
10:50 p.m.
On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 11:39 PM, John Meacham
(+>) seems to imply to me that the operator is non-associative. Something like (<>) or (<+>) would be better.
It's too similar to the applicative (*>), and implies all sorts of things like different types of the two arguments and so on. D -- Dougal Stanton dougal@dougalstanton.net // http://www.dougalstanton.net