[Haskell-cafe] Re: 'par' - why has it the type a -> b -> b ?

"Sean Leather" wrote:

...

...

(\x y -> y)

*shudder*

I just can't stand such things.

What is it that you can't stand? Would you prefer "flip const"?

It's the missing "x" on the right side. Makes my internal C compiler ache. -- (c) this sig last receiving data processing entity. Inspect headers for copyright history. All rights reserved. Copying, hiring, renting, performance and/or quoting of this signature prohibited.