Re: [Haskell-cafe] Re: Thinking about what's missing in our library coverage

gale:

Other "batteries included" platforms contain various tools for processing markup that are far less general than pandoc. This is a place where Haskell can shine.

So yes, pandoc should definitely be included in the platform. All that said, though, I will certainly agree that it is not currently in the top 5.

I agree with this. We would shine, but maybe not for the first cut. Especially since the maintainer has requested this. Note also: pandoc is GPL -- Don