
My first guess was a pattern match, but it sounded a bit odd because there
is no explicit constructor in case of numbers. If there were an explicit
constructor it would have been easier to imagine this as a pattern match.
This seems to be a weird side effect of the special handling of numbers.
-harendra
On 24 February 2017 at 07:37, Brandon Allbery
On Thu, Feb 23, 2017 at 9:05 PM, Harendra Kumar
wrote: Kids have this amazing ability to break any toy in minutes. I gave my seven year old daughter ghci to play with and in a little while she said it is broken:
let 1 = 2
1
1
Earlier, I had explained to her about symbols and assigning values to symbols, and I said numbers are not symbols. But when she came up with this I could not explain what's going on. How can "1 = 2" be a valid equation? Am I missing something fundamental here, or it is just broken?
It's a pattern match. The match fails, but as it produced no bindings it cannot be observed and its success or failure is irrelevant.
-- brandon s allbery kf8nh sine nomine associates allbery.b@gmail.com ballbery@sinenomine.net unix, openafs, kerberos, infrastructure, xmonad http://sinenomine.net