Re: [Haskell-cafe] cap 3: stopping thread 3 (stackoverflow)

7 Jun 2011

      Hi,

On 07/06/11 14:22, Johannes Waldmann wrote:
...
Would this work better with Data.Sequence instead of List?
(Is there a really cheap way (O(1)) to split some Data.Sequence roughly in half?)
I came up with this using immutable unboxed arrays, which gives a nice 
parallel speedup (and somehow avoids the stack overflows, I didn't work 
out where they were coming from unfortunately):

   SPARKS: 1000268 (102821 converted, 0 pruned)
   INIT  time    0.02s  (  0.02s elapsed)
   MUT   time    0.90s  (  0.46s elapsed)
   GC    time    0.03s  (  0.03s elapsed)
   EXIT  time    0.01s  (  0.04s elapsed)
   Total time    0.97s  (  0.53s elapsed)
   %GC time       3.1%  (5.8% elapsed)
   Alloc rate    586,961,335 bytes per MUT second
   Productivity  94.4% of total user, 173.5% of total elapsed

on my dual-core laptop until around 1e6 elements when I compile with:

ghc -O2 -Wall --make -threaded -rtsopts -fforce-recomp Subseqsum.hs

and run with:

./Subseqsum 1e6 +RTS -N -s -M1G -A512M

but after that (eg: 1e7) the GC time dominates and it slows right down.

Note that I haven't tested it for correctness!  So there may be bugs:

----8<----
import Data.List (unfoldr)
import Control.Parallel (par, pseq)
import Data.Monoid (Monoid, mempty, mappend)
import Data.Array.Unboxed (UArray, listArray, (!))
import System.Environment (getArgs)

main :: IO ()
main = do
     [ nn ] <- getArgs
     let n = read nn
         xs = stuff
         a = listArray (0, n - 1) xs
     print . t $ sss 0 n a

stuff :: [Int]
stuff = unfoldr ( \ x -> seq x $ Just ( x, mod (113 * x + 558) 335 - 167 
) ) 0

data O = O { s :: ! Int, l :: !Int, r :: !Int , t :: !Int }

instance Monoid O where
   mempty  = O { s = 0, r = 0, l = 0, t = 0 }
   o1 `mappend` o2 =
     let s' = s o1 + s o2
         r' = max (r o2) ( s o2 + r o1 )
         l' = max (l o1) ( s o1 + l o2 )
         t' = max (r o1 + l o2)
            $ max ( t o1 ) (  t o2 )
     in      O { s = s', r = r', l = l', t = t' }
msingle :: Int -> O
msingle x = O { s = x, r = max x 0, l = max x 0, t = max x 0}

sss :: Int -> Int -> UArray Int Int -> O
sss lo hi a
   | lo == hi = mempty
   | lo + 1 == hi = msingle (a ! lo)
   | otherwise =
       let mid = (lo + hi) `div` 2
           x = sss lo mid a
           y = sss mid hi a
       in  x `par` y `pseq` (x `mappend` y)
----8<----
...
PS: I keep telling my students that "structural parallel programming"
I don't know that term, so I might be missing the point.  Sorry if so.

Thanks,

Claude
-- 
http://claudiusmaximus.goto10.org

Re: [Haskell-cafe] cap 3: stopping thread 3 (stackoverflow)

Claude Heiland-Allen