I have found that splitting functionality off into a library is way too
useful for a lot of things anyway, so I'd just do that.
On Aug 22, 2014 6:49 PM, "Bram Neijt"
Dear reader,
I have a single executable package in Cabal[1] and I have added a test for it using an example configuration from the ltc package[2].
With my test on my executable I can't depend on the main package, but I seem to have to repeat the dependencies of my executable, or split off functionality into a library. [3]
Can I easily depend on the dependencies of another package or should I create a library and depend on that in my test and executable?
All source is at: https://github.com/bneijt/after/
Greetings,
Bram
[1] https://github.com/bneijt/after/blob/master/after.cabal [2] https://github.com/scvalex/ltc/blob/master/ltc.cabal [3] A part of my cabal file added below
executable after main-is: Main.hs build-depends: base >=4.7 && <4.8, options ==1.*, directory ==1.2.*, parallel-io ==0.3.*, filepath ==1.3.*, unix ==2.7.* hs-source-dirs: src ghc-options: -Wall default-language: Haskell2010
test-suite afterTests hs-source-dirs: test src main-is: AfterTest.hs type: exitcode-stdio-1.0 build-depends: base >=4.7 && <4.8, unix ==2.7.*, -- Here because of after depending on it directory ==1.2.*, -- Here because of after depending on it filepath ==1.3.*, -- Here because of after depending on it test-framework, test-framework-hunit, HUnit default-language: Haskell2010 _______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe