
17 Jun
2010
17 Jun
'10
5:55 p.m.
caseyh@istar.ca writes:
The functional-object style seems to be gaining momentum. Is there any way to convert monads into objects, so that beginners have an easier time with the syntax and thus we can attract more people to the language?
I seriously have no idea what you're talking about here. What is the "functional-object style" and why would we want to convert monads into objects? Anyway, have a look at: * http://www.timber-lang.org/ * http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/O%27Haskell (homepage link seems down) * http://homepages.cwi.nl/~ralf/OOHaskell/ * http://www.haskell.org/haskellwiki/The_Monad.Reader/Issue3/Functional_Progra... etc. -- Ivan Lazar Miljenovic Ivan.Miljenovic@gmail.com IvanMiljenovic.wordpress.com