12 Feb
2010
12 Feb
'10
11:01 a.m.
On 12.02.10 16:29, Simon Marlow wrote:
I'm aware that some people need a GC with shorter pause times. We'll probably put that on the roadmap at some point.
for some applications (like realtime audio processing) it would be interesting to even have short pause times with a guaranteed upper bound, but i realize this is a very specialized need that could be better served by making the GC implementation swappable (which otoh doesn't seem to be trivial). <sk>