
Thanks for the replies, all. It's good to see that the other iteratee
packages out there are addressing this issue.
I still don't get why it's an issue in the first place. It seems to me like
a pretty simple thing to implement:
(=$=) :: (Monad m)
=> Enumeratee a0 a1 m (Step a2 m b) -> Enumeratee a1 a2 m b
-> Enumeratee a0 a2 m b
(=$=) e01 e12 step = Iteratee $ do
step' <- runIteratee $ e12 step
runIteratee . joinI $ e01 step'
This puts a type restriction on the LHS enumeratee, but enumeratees are
generally polymorphic in the last type param anyway. (And joinE has a
similar restriction when composing an enumerator with an enumeratee.)
Is there a good reason why enumerator doesn't export this or something
analogous?
Mike Craig
On Sun, Dec 25, 2011 at 10:20 PM, Conrad Parker
On 24 December 2011 05:47, Michael Craig
wrote: I've been looking for a way to compose enumeratees in the enumerator package, but I've come up with nothing so far. I want this function
(=$=) :: Monad m => Enumeratee a0 a1 m b -> Enumeratee a1 a2 m b -> Enumeratee a0 a2 m b
I'm building a modular library on top of enumerator that facilitates reading time series data from a DB, applying any number of transformations to it, and then writing it back / doing something else with it. I'd like to be able to write simple transformations (enumeratees) and compose them without binding them to either a db reader (enumerator) or db writer (iteratee).
I've been looking at the iterIO package as a possible alternative, because it seems to allow easy composition of Inums (enumeratees). I'm a little skittish of it because it seems unpopular next to enumerator.
Hi Michael,
You could also look at the iteratee package. This is the signature of the (><>) operator:
(><>) :: (Nullable s1, Monad m) => (forall x. Enumeratee s1 s2 m x) -> Enumeratee s2 s3 m a -> Enumeratee s1 s3 m a
it's quite useful for composing enumeratees, likewise its friend (<><) swims the other way.
http://hackage.haskell.org/packages/archive/iteratee/0.8.7.5/doc/html/Data-I...
cheers,
Conrad.