Re: [Haskell-cafe] ANNOUNCE: ipatch, the interactive patch editor

This would benifit darcs, as the help-text would be correct even if I've renamed the executable. For example darcs-beta vs. darcs. On Aug 23, 2010 3:49 PM, "Joachim Breitner" wrote:

Hi,

Am Montag, den 23.08.2010, 13:43 -0700 schrieb Jason Dagit:

...

On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 1:32 PM, Joachim Breitner wrote:

$ ipatch split --help Usage: darcs split [OPTION]... <PATCHFILE>

Darcs?

$ ./dist/build/ipatch/ipatch apply --help Usage: darcs apply [OPTION]... <PATCHFILE>

Darcs?

I assume those are typos left over from borrowing code?

actually I’m not borrowing the code, I’m using the Darcs API, including the Help and Command infrastructure, which is not fully generalized yet. I need to have a look at the Darcs code and think of the best way of making it more configurable, without changing it too much or making it harder for Darcs itself.

The function in question is getCommandHelpCore in Darcs.Commands. Maybe the name of the executable could be placed in the 'Command' record, then it would be available everywhere where needed. If someone from the Darcs team wants to help here, that would of course be appreciated.

Greetings, Joachim

-- Joachim "nomeata" Breitner mail: mail@joachim-breitner.de | ICQ# 74513189 | GPG-Key: 4743206C JID: nomeata@joachim-breitner.de | http://www.joachim-breitner.de/ Debian Developer: nomeata@debian.org