Re: [Haskell-cafe] Proposal: (.:) operator in base.

Aeson (and cassava) use is very isolated. FWIW (.=) is in aeson (and other serialising libs) and lens, and do totally different things. I never needed both in the same module. Bikeshedding: if (.:) goes to base, why not also (.:.) and (.::) and … I’m -1, there is `composition` package [1], and I rather see base shrink, not grow. - Oleg - [1] http://hackage.haskell.org/package/composition-1.0.2.1/docs/Data-Composition... http://hackage.haskell.org/package/composition-1.0.2.1/docs/Data-Composition...

On 18 Aug 2016, at 07:22, Albert Y. C. Lai wrote:

(.:) is already used in both aeson and cassava. And not for (.) . (.)

_______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list To (un)subscribe, modify options or view archives go to: http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe Only members subscribed via the mailman list are allowed to post.