Re: [Haskell-cafe] Re: Why is there no splitBy in the list module?

Quoth "Jared Updike" : (... quoting me) |> Hence I would much rather have the split condition be the first |> parameter -- the infix notation looks good, but it will need a |> "flip" to get the parameters in the right order. | | This also goes along with join in python, i.e. | | "\n".join(xs) | ==> | "\n" `join` xs | in Haskell (where join sep = concat . intersperse sep ) Suit yourself! Since we seem to be in agreement on the basic point, I won't go into what I think about "\n".join(xs). Donn Cave, donn@drizzle.com