One thing that I truly HATE about Scala API reference is that they show you the "simple" (meaning: fake) type, and you have to click to see the real type. It makes going through docs so much slower.
10.02.2016, 17:01, "Raphael Gaschignard"
I think the "show a simple type, then the 'real' type " solution is pretty good ( especially since you need to be doing type level programming to hit issues where the simple type doesn't hold anyways) , but on the topic of several languages: doesn't Haskell98 kind of solve the teaching issue? If you're using the standard stuff stick to the old $...
I know Racket does some "language swapping" so that a beginner language is available . I don't know how well that works ,
_______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe