Does this code compile? The line "type Sales = Sales Record" for
instance is wrong - it should be "data Sales = Sales Record".
Additionally "recordSale" returns an Int, not [Sales].
-deech
On Mon, Jul 5, 2010 at 10:50 AM, Mrwibbly
This really helped, but now I am trying to add a new track to the database using a menu but it won't compile. I have tried a lot of different things but to no avail.
When I get rid of the menu I am able to run, for example, newRecord "This Charming Man" "The Smiths" 1 []
This adds the data to an empty database but I can't seem to call newRecord again and add another record to the existing database.
Thanks for your help previously,
Jack
type Title = String type Artist = String type Sold = Int type Sales = Sales Record type Record = (Title, Artist, Sold)
testDatabase :: [Sales] testDatabase = [(Sales "Jack" "Waters" 2)]
--recordSale :: Sales -> String -> String -> Sales --recordSale title artist = (title, artist)
newRecord :: Record -> [Sales] -> [Sales] newRecord title artist sold dbase = (title, artist, sold):dbase
recordSale :: Record -> [Sales] recordSale record sales = sold + 1
main :: [Sales] -> IO() main dbase = do putStrLn "1 = Add a new record: " input <- getLine let x = read input :: Int if x == 1 then do putStrLn "Please enter a title: " title <- getLine putStrLn "Please enter an artist name: " artist <- getLine putStrLn "Please enter the number sales: " sales <- getInt newRecord (Sales title artist sales []) dbase
Holger Siegel wrote:
Am 01.07.2010 um 21:56 schrieb Mrwibbly:
I'm having real trouble starting this project. Basically I have to create a record store that store information about artists and albums and also the number of sales that they have had. It also needs to generate a list of the top 5 sellers.
So far I have: recordSale :: Sales -> String -> String -> Sales
where recordSale sales anArtist aTrack returns a modified version of the sales.
Any help getting started on this would be gratefully received. I don't want answers, I just want help getting started.
First, I would state explicitly what a record is: It is a tuple of an artist's name and a record's name
type Record = (String, String)
Now function recordSale has type
recordSale :: Sales -> Record -> Sales
This is the an "uncurried" equivalent of your definition. You can read it as "from a sales object you get to another sales object via a (sold) record". That already seems to be a good abstraction, but we can do better: If you flip the arguments, you get
recordSale :: Record -> Sales -> Sales
Now you can create a sale (recordSale ("Zappa", "Apostrophe")). This sale is a function of type (Sales -> Sales) that modifies your sales. We state this by defining
type Sale = Sales -> Sales
recordSale :: Record -> Sale
Sales can be concatenated with the dot operator (.) and there is even a "neutral sale", the function 'id'. Thus, you know immediately that for any sales x,y,z there is (x . (y . z) == (x . y) . z) and (x . id == x). In other words, it forms a monoid - just like the number of sales together with (+) and 0!
If you're only interested in the number of sales, you can simply define
type Sales = Integer
recordSale record sales = sales + 1
But you don't want to keep track of the whole number of sales - you want a number for every record you have sold. That means, you need a data structure that maps records to their number of sales:
import Data.Map
type Sales = Map Record Integer
It's a bit tricky to find an implementation for recordSale. Think of how you can combine two arbitrary Sales objects before you try to implement it.
Regards, Holger
_______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
-- View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/Getting-started-tp29046956p29073993.html Sent from the Haskell - Haskell-Cafe mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
_______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe