Hello Claus, Saturday, August 4, 2007, 7:55:18 PM, you wrote:
so, there could be a library defining
lhs ==: rhs = putMVar <$> lhs <*> rhs
the lifted operations combine as the unlifted ones do. so there's one definition each for =, /, +, not one definition for each of their combinations.
it's called doublethinking :) when you count operations, you count only primitive ones. when you say about easiness of programming, you propose to define special operation for each access pattern. it's obvious for you that using only standard operations, it's hard to read and write code, and using special operations, you will need to define special one for each usage pattern -- Best regards, Bulat mailto:Bulat.Ziganshin@gmail.com