20 Feb
2009
20 Feb
'09
6:24 p.m.
Hello John, Saturday, February 21, 2009, 2:14:25 AM, you wrote:
Heh. He probably meant something more like "jhc is not a production compiler" which is true for a lot of projects. For projects of substantial size or that require many extensions, jhc falls somewhat short. It is getting better though. Of course, help is always appreciated. :)
what is "substantial size"? can jhc be used for video codec, i.e. probably no extensions - just raw computations, and thousands or tens of thousands LOCs? -- Best regards, Bulat mailto:Bulat.Ziganshin@gmail.com