And conversely, someone who have made a C-to-Haskell binding may not be a
Haskell guru.
What about Arrows: do you think one should master them so that he could be
regarded as experienced?
It's kind of hard to put a border between casual Haskell and skilled
Haskell, since it's a very wide language and your knowledge will depend on
what you have already done.
2010/7/3 Thomas Davie
On 3 Jul 2010, at 11:04, Brandon S Allbery KF8NH wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
On 7/3/10 05:57 , Andrew Coppin wrote:
Agreed. So let me rephrase: Why should _every_ Haskell library involve C? ;-)
Who says they do, or should?
Dons rather implied it... The suggestion is that someone who hasn't used hsc2hs is an inexperienced Haskeller... I'd bet though that there are many *extremely* experienced haskellers who have never once in their life written a C binding.
Bob_______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe