That sounds like a reasonable modification; if you want, free to fork it at http://github.com/gcross/binary-protocol and push me your proposed changes. Cheers, Greg On Apr 8, 2010, at 9:12 AM, Yves Parès wrote:
By the way, Gregory, concerning the package binary-protocol, I was wondering if it was possible to turn the BinaryProtocol monad from type BinaryProtocol = StateT (Handle, Handle, ByteString) IO to: type BinaryProtocol = StateT (Handle, Handle, ByteString)
And then the functions, like runProtocol, would become: runProtocol :: (MonadIO m) => BinaryProtocol m a -> Handle -> Handle -> m a
I mean that BinaryProtocol could run within any MonadIO, not only IO. This would turn the BinaryProtocol into a monad trans, which would be more generic (we could for instance stack two BinaryProtocols).
Yves Parès wrote:
Problem tracked!
It comes from the last version of bytestring package. I tried with bytestring-0.9.1.5, and it works perfectly.
Do you know where I should submit this bug?
----- Yves Parès
Live long and prosper -- View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/Simple-binary-protocol-through-network-test-tp28157883... Sent from the Haskell - Haskell-Cafe mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
_______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe