
6 Jun
2009
6 Jun
'09
11:26 a.m.
Tim Newsham
Could it be the "amb" described at http://conal.net/blog/posts/functional-concurrency-with-unambiguous-choice/ http://conal.net/blog/posts/smarter-termination-for-thread-racing/ ? It reminds me a little of unamb but is different.
I agree, but could it be the "amb" described there? -- Edit this signature at http://www.digitas.harvard.edu/cgi-bin/ken/sig We want our revolution, and we want it now! -- Marat/Sade We want our revolution, and we'll take it at such time as you've gotten around to delivering it -- Haskell programmer