[Haskell-cafe] Re: The container problem

...

I'm not actually bothered about every possible monad being representable as such in Haskell. I'd just like Set to work. ;-)

What would "work" mean in this case? I see two different meanings:

1. Use monadic operations (mapM, guard) on Sets. 2. Make the nice monadic syntax work for sets.

"Ariel J. Birnbaum" wrote: 3. implement >>=, guardS and mapS for data MyHack Set = MyHack Set and abuse the do-notation for your own wicked purposes. -- (c) this sig last receiving data processing entity. Inspect headers for copyright history. All rights reserved. Copying, hiring, renting, performance and/or broadcasting of this signature prohibited.