Re: [Haskell-cafe] Fixity declaration extension

AntC writes:

I agree. I don't declare operators very often, and when I do I always struggle to remember which way round the precedence numbers go. [...] (Anything else we can bikeshed about while we're at it?)

infixl * before + Perhaps "before" and "after" clearer than "higher" and "lower"? -k -- If I haven't seen further, it is by standing in the footprints of giants