19 Nov
2007
19 Nov
'07
5:01 p.m.
Brandon S. Allbery KF8NH wrote:
On Nov 19, 2007, at 15:13 , Neil Mitchell wrote:
- The packages seem to be of quite variable quality. Some are excellent, some are rather poor (or just not maintained any more).
The problem is that only one person gets to comment on the quality of a library, the author, who is about the least objective person.
The ability to "vote" on packages might be interesting here. If there's 4 HTML libraries and one of them gets lots of votes, it's probably the one to look at first.
It occurred to me that the voting could be implicit. That is, if 10 libraries/programs use library X, then library X gets 10 votes. Kind of like Google PageRank for libraries. Greetings, Mads Lindstrøm