j
k
j a
j l
...* It would be nice if this worked inside the do-notation, too: do x :: Ordering x <- m (This is curently a syntax error.) I think the following works with -fglasgow-exts: do (x :: Ordering) <- m
* It would be nice if this worked inside the do-notation, too: do x :: Ordering x <- m (This is curently a syntax error.)
* It would be nice if this worked inside the do-notation, too:
do x :: Ordering x <- m
(This is curently a syntax error.)
I think the following works with -fglasgow-exts:
do (x :: Ordering) <- m
I know, but it is not as nice! ;-) Wolfram
Back to the thread
Back to the list