
30 May
2008
30 May
'08
10:10 a.m.
Hello, Does anyone know if it is possible to specify a default definition for an associated type synonym? When I tried: class A a where
type B a = a
GHC (version 6.9.20080309) told me: "Type declaration in a class must be a kind signature or synonym default". However, when I look at the parser I see no way to specify such synonym default. Is this possible? Thanks, Zé Pedro