
11 Feb
2009
11 Feb
'09
11:40 a.m.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Simon Marlow wrote: | FUD! CAFs are definitely garbage collected, in fact we have a big lump | of code generator and runtime complexity (Static Reference Tables, SRTs) | to ensure that they do. | | However, GHCi doesn't always GC CAFs, perhaps that's what you meant. The FUD is probably due to my own misunderstanding. Perhaps I did get that impression from GHCi. Sorry about that. - - Jake -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iEYEARECAAYFAkmS/2YACgkQye5hVyvIUKkcEwCgtAfixwQL69lILm1lHFOk8Dj3 55kAnjBV8ZkkMSwRWZOCwKbPaH8VTHdq =DKgU -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----