Re: [Haskell-cafe] Foreign.Marshal.Error.void

mapM and mapM_ have different complexity - I don't know if the compiler would be smart enough to infer mapM_ style behavior for (void . mapM). /g On Tue, Oct 14, 2008 at 10:52 AM, Mauricio wrote:

Hi,

Wouldn't it be nice if we had something like 'void' in Foreign.Marshal.Error in standard monad functions, so that we could use it instead of, for instance, mapM_ or sequence_?

Best, Maurício

_______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe

-- I am in here