
On Sat, Apr 18, 2009 at 11:11 AM, michael rice
To compare two functions in C, I would compare their machine addresses.
Why would you need that at all?
How would *you* do it?
Do what? What is the problem? No, I don't mean "comparing two functions". I rather mean, why are you comparing these functions? What question is the comparison answering, and how are you using that answer? Is address comparison really what your code wants, or do you want some stronger property? Luke
Michael
================
--- On *Sat, 4/18/09, Eugene Kirpichov
* wrote: From: Eugene Kirpichov
Subject: Re: [Haskell-cafe] General function to count list elements? To: "michael rice" Cc: haskell-cafe@haskell.org Date: Saturday, April 18, 2009, 12:39 PM 2009/4/18 michael rice
http://mc/compose?to=nowgate@yahoo.com : I know functions can be compared in Scheme
Welcome to DrScheme, version 4.1 [3m]. Language: Swindle; memory limit: 128 megabytes.
(equal? equal? equal?) #t
That's not the functions being compared, but the memory addresses of the code implementing them. If your goal is comparing functions to answer a question "Are these two values indistinguishable?", equal? doesn't help you, because it may answer 'false' even if these two values are indistinguishable from a mathematical point of view.
but apparently not in Haskell
[michael@localhost ~]$ ghci GHCi, version 6.10.1: http://www.haskell.org/ghc/ http://www.haskell.org/ghc/%C2%A0:? for help Loading package ghc-prim ... linking ... done. Loading package integer ... linking ... done. Loading package base ... linking ... done. Prelude> (==) (==) (==)
<interactive>:1:0: No instance for (Eq (a -> a -> Bool)) arising from a use of `==' at <interactive>:1:0-13 Possible fix: add an instance declaration for (Eq (a -> a -> Bool)) In the expression: (==) (==) (==) In the definition of `it': it = (==) (==) (==) Prelude>
though I'm new at Haskell and may not be posing the question properly.
I would think a language with 1st-class support for functions would certainly include comparing them.
Again, this is first-class support for memory addresses of code representing functions.
To compare two functions in C, I would compare their machine addresses.
Why would you need that at all?
Michael
--- On Sat, 4/18/09, Eugene Kirpichov
http://mc/compose?to=ekirpichov@gmail.com> wrote: From: Eugene Kirpichov
http://mc/compose?to=ekirpichov@gmail.com Subject: Re: [Haskell-cafe] General function to count list elements? To: "michael rice"
http://mc/compose?to=nowgate@yahoo.com Cc: haskell-cafe@haskell.orghttp://mc/compose?to=haskell-cafe@haskell.org Date: Saturday, April 18, 2009, 11:39 AM
Could you then provide an example of two functions that *are* equal, or, even better, a definition of equality for arbitrary functions? Since Haskell may be compiled into C, this must be a definition that is implementable in C.
Though I haven't tried it out, it's trying to use my function to count functions.
The first argument is the identity function.
The second argument is a list of a different form of the identity function.
Though the two identity functions, given the same input, would produce
2009/4/18 michael rice
http://mc/compose?to=nowgate@yahoo.com : the same output, I doubt they would be equal.
So my guess at an answer would be zero.
Michael
--- On Sat, 4/18/09, Eugene Kirpichov
http://mc/compose?to=ekirpichov@gmail.com> wrote: From: Eugene Kirpichov
http://mc/compose?to=ekirpichov@gmail.com Subject: Re: [Haskell-cafe] General function to count list elements? To: "michael rice"
http://mc/compose?to=nowgate@yahoo.com Cc: haskell-cafe@haskell.orghttp://mc/compose?to=haskell-cafe@haskell.org Date: Saturday, April 18, 2009, 11:03 AM
What should
count (\x -> x) (replicate 10 (\y -> if 1==1 then y else undefined))
return?
2009/4/18 michael rice
http://mc/compose?to=nowgate@yahoo.com : Is there a general function to count list elements. I'm trying this
count :: a -> [a] -> Int count x ys = length (filter (== x) ys)
with this error upon loading
=============
[michael@localhost ~]$ ghci count GHCi, version 6.10.1: http://www.haskell.org/ghc/ http://www.haskell.org/ghc/%C2%A0:? for help Loading package ghc-prim ... linking ... done. Loading package integer ... linking ... done. Loading package base ... linking ... done. [1 of 1] Compiling Main ( count.hs, interpreted )
count.hs:2:29: Could not deduce (Eq a) from the context () arising from a use of `==' at count.hs:2:29-32 Possible fix: add (Eq a) to the context of the type signature for `count' In the first argument of `filter', namely `(== x)' In the first argument of `length', namely `(filter (== x) ys)' In the expression: length (filter (== x) ys) Failed, modules loaded: none. Prelude>
=============
Not sure what it's trying to tell me other than I need an (Eq a) somewhere.
Michael
_______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list Haskell-Cafe@haskell.orghttp://mc/compose?to=Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
-- Eugene Kirpichov Web IR developer, market.yandex.ru
-- Eugene Kirpichov Web IR developer, market.yandex.ru
-- Eugene Kirpichov Web IR developer, market.yandex.ru
_______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe