
23 May
2015
23 May
'15
12:30 a.m.
Performance will go utterly out the window if you use pattern synonyms
and the like to pretend that Text is [Char]. It would probably work
fine (great, even) when matching, but code that assumes String=[Char]
would be completely killed on the construction side, because building
Text by consing, or repeatedly prepending small chunks, is
ridiculously inefficient. These are the very things that are
*efficient* with [Char], and that people have assumed to be efficient
when writing code that uses it.
On May 22, 2015 5:58 PM, "Carter Schonwald"
one direction that this thread has *COMPLETELY* overlooked is the following:
could we use pattern synonyms or something along those lines to make the migration to Text or the like more seemless?