
18 Jan
2017
18 Jan
'17
5:39 p.m.
Am 20.08.2016 um 20:33 schrieb Brandon Allbery:
You might want to look at cpphs as an alternative preprocessor. There are some ancient K&R-era hacks that could be used if absolutely necessary, but cpphs should be a much simpler and cleaner solution.
Is there any reason /not/ to prefer cpphs over cpp? If not, why does anyone still use cpp for Haskell? Cheers Ben -- "Make it so they have to reboot after every typo." ― Scott Adams