-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 27/04/13 10:23, Alistair Bayley wrote:
How's about Creole? http://wikicreole.org/
Found it via this: http://www.wilfred.me.uk/blog/2012/07/30/why-markdown-is-not-my-favourite-la...
If you go with Markdown, I vote for one of the Pandoc implementations, probably Pandoc (strict): http://johnmacfarlane.net/babelmark2/
(at least then we're not creating yet another standard...)
Alistair
I'd very much like to avoid creating yet another Markdown flavour but I don't think it will be possible to use an existing one in its entirety. The issue (?) with Creole is [1], where you're allowed to tack on anything you want in the parts not covered in the spec. If you ask me, this sounds exactly like what the case was with the original `specification' of Markdown: the documentation was just too damn vague and ambiguous so we ended up with every company interpreting it themselves in a way that was favourable to them. Is there any reason in particular why you'd like Pandoc (strict) Markdown rather than any other flavour? - -- Mateusz K. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJRfAZrAAoJEM1mucMq2pqX9vgQAKdOnxJgMoT7GpUEyWGZqNt5 2k2yANgjDIcCDcmK+g8B6USTDAV/guDXyLxK6b/gfGYApBqxzyegE/ogxh6zquoq bdaa0BoIQCRsguHy136WX+uwgNH8KN6L684bVpW0960yrtuRK3ow0uklM6wkvQR3 5V8BU7vhKyVxldgEkPQMLMI+u8ppVDUp6RUW/7EQctunmgWwzaO3LMhrc8eBjumc saee0SR9yUlpFq8zEQIw+EGqsokY5lPbbhfUJwDYbqtm/LRgL5rw+NhptIf1GgFm hGvLqsUsdRRLx5GH/FN2PoQNt4xnqjoPEOXL60p5SYtBvDmfFOFkJ+1oGCrM0JLl Yy4BtcXJpRxFEaWYq/TGaDWdIRSpRZ2JvSwlnHW+EpnXKnPVnReKOzIa4iPD94qS WdX+uK/v6ikmRbht1rkNvV3a+oWYpwx7dIhk+XzcMKxsb1DJ5bmI2/SxfhARcWxJ zXhhYJSB/TpsvPAlKcT3emLJUwaigxr59JxlDmnq9goYl/MZVZDe4ihCH8JwC/hE oHrG7TL5HPLxWjiJ/cmyOsoVgcwgu0SxH4vsHqtFs66uYZ1gPahw6ILJlS0y3lbb XH9w4dkZybXUYPohD5ZZZXtWTKP+xGGNPdvC8D2K0yYNDTXBvXhl9R6S+oBRFIZs G/VgHSOw3givgsrQT+BZ =vZF9 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----